Is Inequality Inevitable? (Scientific American) makes a compelling argument about wealth that I’ve always suspected but lacked support.

The key ideas I took away from Bruce Boghosian’s article are:

  1. The affine wealth model reveals the tendency towards wealth concentration or extreme inequality even if the outcome of a transaction is chosen randomly.
  2. If the transaction outcome is random, then luck plays a bigger role in amassing wealth than most people think.
  3. Wealth tends to flow upward.
  4. As a result, the free market is essentially a casino you can never leave.
  5. Fortunately, redistribution sets a limit on inequality, but it’s not necessarily a tax (see chi, zeta and kappa parameters of the affine wealth model).

See also

  1. StackBacks automated budget system
  2. Neutralizing social Darwinism
  3. Who rules America?
  4. Better schools won’t fix America